What Your Enemies Can Teach You About Leadership
Most of us know what to do with advice from people we trust. We listen. We consider it. We may not agree with everything they say, but we usually assume it comes from a good place.
It gets much harder when the information comes from someone we don't trust. A difficult colleague points out a weakness. A competitor exposes a problem in your strategy. Someone who clearly does not have your best interests at heart knows exactly how to get under your skin. A person who has criticized you before says something that, despite how badly you want to dismiss it, lands a little too close to home.
Our instinct is usually one of two things. We give the person far too much space in our head, or we decide that because we don't trust the source, nothing they say deserves our attention.
Neither response is particularly useful.
Some of the most uncomfortable information we receive can come from people who are not rooting for us. That doesn't make them right. It doesn't make their behavior acceptable. It certainly doesn't mean they deserve continued access to us... But it may mean they noticed something worth noticing.
Learning how to separate the person delivering the information from the information itself is an underrated leadership skill.
The People Who Support You Don't Always See You the Same Way
The people who care about us usually view us with context. They know our intentions. They understand what we were trying to do. They remember the hundred things we got right before the one thing went wrong.
That generosity is valuable. We need people who know us well enough to see more than our worst moment.
It can also create blind spots.
Someone who likes you may overlook the fact that you dominate certain conversations because they know you're passionate. Someone who trusts your leadership may excuse inconsistent communication because they understand how much you're carrying.
A colleague who has worked beside you for years may know exactly what you meant, even though a newer employee has no idea.
Then someone who isn't particularly fond of you points directly at the problem.
Your first reaction may be defensiveness. Mine would probably be too, but Psychological Leadership asks a different question: What did they see?
You don't have to accept their interpretation of your character to examine their observation of your behavior.
There is a difference.
Bad Intentions Don't Automatically Make Information Wrong
This is where ego can get in the way of growth. We tend to evaluate feedback based partly on how we feel about the person giving it.
If we respect them, their words carry weight.
If we don't, we want to throw the whole thing away.
Human? Absolutely. Useful? Not always.
Someone can dislike you and still correctly identify a weakness in your presentation. A competitor can hope you fail and still expose a flaw in your business model. A former employee can be angry and still raise a legitimate concern about the way your organization communicates.
A difficult person can intentionally push at an insecurity and accidentally reveal something you haven't fully worked through.
Their motives and the accuracy of the information are two separate questions.
This doesn't mean every accusation deserves analysis. Some criticism is distorted, uninformed, deliberately cruel, or simply wrong. Leadership requires enough internal stability to tell the difference.
Instead of immediately asking, "Who are they to say this about me?" it can be more useful to ask, "Is there anything here I need to know?"
Sometimes the answer will be no. Sometimes one small part will be worth keeping.
Pay Attention to What Makes You Defensive
There are criticisms we can hear and dismiss almost immediately. Then there are the ones we replay in the shower three days later.
That doesn't necessarily mean the criticism was accurate. It does mean something that it got our attention. Defensiveness is information.
Maybe the person touched an insecurity you already carry.
Maybe you're angry because you've been misunderstood.
Maybe they identified something you've quietly worried about yourself.
Maybe their accusation reminds you of an earlier experience.
Maybe you know there is a small amount of truth underneath an exaggerated version of the story.
The point isn't to treat every emotional reaction as evidence that someone else is right. It's to become curious about why certain things have the power to destabilize you.
If a person's words can change the way you see yourself for days, there is something worth understanding there, even if the lesson has very little to do with them.
Difficult People Can Expose Weak Boundaries
Sometimes you don't know where a boundary is missing until someone crosses it.
You didn't realize you were sharing too much information until it was repeated.
You didn't realize how often you made exceptions for one employee until those exceptions became expectations.
You didn't realize a business relationship had become too informal until accountability disappeared.
You didn't realize how much emotional access someone had until they used what they knew against you.
It is tempting to look back and decide the lesson is to become less trusting. I don't think that's the most useful conclusion.
The better question is whether your trust had enough discernment around it.
Boundaries are not proof that you expect people to hurt you. They clarify the conditions under which relationships, teams, and partnerships can function well.
A painful experience may reveal a place where those conditions were never clearly established.
You can learn that lesson without becoming suspicious of everyone who comes next.
Your Competition May Be Showing You Where You've Become Comfortable
Enemies are not always personal. Sometimes they're competitors. Sometimes they're the company taking market share you assumed was secure. The executive asking harder questions than everyone else in the room. The candidate who gets the opportunity you wanted. The business that seems to understand your audience in a way you haven't considered.
It's easy to make competition personal because losing feels personal, but leadership becomes more useful when curiosity replaces resentment.
What are they doing well?
Where are they moving faster?
What are customers responding to?
What have they understood that you haven't?
Where have you become too comfortable with the way things have always been done?
You don't need to become them. You shouldn't copy something simply because it appears successful, but refusing to learn because you don't like the source is expensive.
A competitor can reveal a weakness in your strategy long before your internal team is willing to call it one.
Watch What Someone Uses Against You
One of the harder lessons in life and leadership comes when someone knows exactly where to press.
They know which criticism will make you question yourself.
They know what reputation matters most to you.
They know what you're afraid people might believe.
They know which insecurity will produce the biggest reaction.
What they choose to do with that knowledge says a great deal about them. What the reaction reveals can still teach you something about yourself.
Maybe you've built too much of your identity around being competent.
Maybe being disliked feels more threatening than you realized.
Maybe criticism from authority still sends you directly into proving mode.
Maybe a particular accusation hurts because you've spent years trying to prove the opposite.
This is where paying attention becomes very different from giving someone power.
You are not asking your enemy to tell you who you are.
You are noticing what their behavior reveals about what still has the ability to shake you.
Those are very different things.
The Lesson May Be Who You Refuse to Become
Not everything we learn from difficult people is about fixing something in ourselves.
Sometimes the lesson is values.
You see what ambition looks like without integrity.
You watch someone become successful by creating fear around them.
You experience what happens when private information becomes leverage.
You see a leader get results while leaving people afraid to speak.
You watch someone mistake control for influence or attention for respect.
Somewhere along the way, you make a decision. I don't want to lead like that.
That decision matters.
Leadership identity is shaped by what we choose to practice, but it is also shaped by what we consciously refuse to normalize. There will always be easier ways to gain power.
There are shortcuts to attention. There are ways to manipulate a room, protect your ego, silence disagreement, control a narrative, or make another person feel smaller.
You can understand those methods without adopting them.
In fact, sometimes seeing them up close gives you a much clearer understanding of the leader you want to be.
Don't Confuse Paying Attention With Giving Someone Access
This distinction matters. Learning from someone does not require keeping them close.
You don't need another conversation.
You don't need reconciliation.
You don't need their approval.
You may decide the healthiest boundary is distance.
Paying attention simply means refusing to waste information because you don't like how you received it.
Take the useful part. Leave the cruelty.
Take the awareness. Leave the judgment.
Take the lesson. Leave the relationship if that's what needs to happen.
There is no leadership prize for allowing someone to continue hurting you because they occasionally teach you something.
The Goal Is Discernment, Not Obsession
There is also danger on the other side. Once you know someone is working against you, it can become very easy to start studying everything they do.
What did they say?
Who are they talking to?
What are they planning?
Why did they post that?
Was that directed at me?
Suddenly, paying attention has turned into organizing your decisions around someone else's behavior. At that point they have far more influence than they deserve. You don't need to ignore your enemies. You also don't need to build your life around anticipating their next move.
Discernment means you can notice something without living inside it. You gather the information you need. You decide whether it matters. You respond if necessary. Then you return your attention to the life, business, team, or career you're actually trying to build.
That return matters because the point of understanding the people who oppose you is not to become consumed by them.
It's to understand yourself more clearly.
Using The RISE Method™
Recognize
Notice what the situation is revealing. What criticism keeps getting your attention? Where are you becoming defensive? Is someone exposing a genuine weakness in your leadership, communication, boundaries, reputation, or strategy?
Recognition does not require agreement. It requires enough curiosity to look before deciding.
Interrupt
Interrupt the urge to immediately dismiss everything because you dislike the source.
At the same time, interrupt the opposite pattern: allowing criticism to become proof that something is wrong with you.
Separate the delivery from the information.
You can reject someone's behavior without automatically rejecting every observation they make.
Self-Lead
Decide what belongs to you. Ask yourself whether there is evidence for the criticism. Look for patterns rather than isolated opinions. Consider whether trusted people have raised something similar in different language.
Then make your own decision about what deserves your attention.
That is what internal authority looks like. You can receive information without surrendering authorship of what it means.
Evolve
Use what you learned. Strengthen the boundary. Change the behavior. Improve the communication. Address the strategic weakness. Work on the insecurity. Clarify your values.
Then leave behind what isn't yours.
Growth does not require turning your enemy into a mentor. Sometimes it simply means refusing to waste the lesson.
Questions Worth Sitting With
Who do I automatically stop listening to because I don't like or trust them?
Has someone I considered difficult identified something I later realized was true?
Which criticisms make me unusually defensive, and what might that reaction be telling me?
Where has someone crossing a line shown me that I needed a clearer boundary?
What have competitors or critics noticed about my work that the people closest to me may have missed?
Have I ever rejected useful information because accepting it felt like allowing the other person to win?
What behavior have I seen in someone else that clarified the kind of leader I never want to become?
Am I paying attention to someone because the information is useful, or because I've allowed them to occupy too much space in my head?
Final Thoughts
We learn a lot from the people who love us. They remind us who we are when we've forgotten. They give us context, patience, support, and the benefit of the doubt.
But they are not our only teachers.
Sometimes the person hoping you stumble notices the crack before anyone else does.
Sometimes the person trying to provoke you exposes an insecurity that still needs your attention.
Sometimes a competitor forces you to get better.
Sometimes someone's lack of integrity gives you absolute clarity about your own.
You don't need to thank people for hurting you. You don't need to pretend betrayal was a gift or cruelty was somehow necessary for your growth.
You can simply refuse to waste what the experience showed you.
Strong leaders don't allow their enemies to define them. They are secure enough to look at the information anyway.
FAQs
Why should leaders listen to their enemies or critics?
Critics, competitors, and difficult colleagues sometimes notice weaknesses or blind spots that supportive people overlook. Listening does not mean agreeing with them. It means evaluating whether the information contains anything useful before deciding what to do with it.
How should a leader respond to unfair criticism?
Begin by separating the tone or intent of the criticism from the actual claim. Determine whether there is evidence for it, whether you've heard similar feedback elsewhere, and whether anything needs your attention. If the criticism is inaccurate or malicious, you can reject it without allowing it to consume your attention.
Can criticism help improve leadership?
Yes. Useful criticism can reveal gaps between intention and impact, weak boundaries, communication problems, strategic blind spots, or areas where a leader has become defensive. The value comes from evaluating the information rather than automatically accepting or rejecting it.
What is the difference between paying attention to an enemy and obsessing over them?
Paying attention gives you useful information and then allows you to return your focus to your own priorities. Obsession keeps your attention centered on the other person's behavior, opinions, or next move. One supports discernment. The other gives away attention and energy.
How does Psychological Leadership™ help leaders deal with criticism?
Psychological Leadership™ encourages leaders to understand what is driving their reactions before responding. Instead of allowing criticism to immediately trigger defensiveness, proving, avoidance, or self-doubt, leaders can examine the information, understand their response, and decide intentionally what deserves action.
How does The RISE Method™ help with difficult people?
The RISE Method™ helps you Recognize what the situation is revealing, Interrupt automatic reactions, Self-Lead by deciding what information deserves your attention, and Evolve by using the lesson without allowing the other person's behavior to determine who you become.
About the Author
Biana Lerman is the founder of Your Growth Leader and the creator of Psychological Leadership™ and The RISE Method™.
Through executive coaching, leadership consulting, keynote speaking, and thought leadership, she helps founders, executives, and high-achieving women understand the psychology behind how they communicate, make decisions, build relationships, and lead.
Her philosophy is simple: Identity comes before leadership.
Ready to Understand What's Really Driving the Way You Lead?
You don't have to believe every criticism you receive. You also don't have to ignore something useful simply because you don't like the person who said it. The more useful question may be: What am I willing to learn, even when I don't like the teacher?
Explore The RISE Method™: Discover the four stages of Psychological Leadership™ and learn how to recognize and interrupt the patterns influencing the way you think, communicate, make decisions, and lead.
Take the RISE Method™ Quiz: Identify where you may be getting stuck and uncover the next stage of growth that requires your attention.
Book a RISE Reflection Session: Work one-on-one with Biana to uncover the beliefs and patterns shaping your leadership and create a path forward built on greater clarity, confidence, and self-trust.
Book Biana to Speak: Bring Psychological Leadership™ to your organization through keynotes and workshops focused on identity, communication, trust, decision-making, and healthier leadership.
Comments